BMW, Toyota, Seven Other Car Companies Face Allegations of Sharing Consumer Location Data Illegally
By Dabbie Davis
May 05, 2024 10:01 PM EDT
It was revealed that out of the 14 automakers, only a limited number insisted on a warrant before divulging consumer location data to authorities. Astonishingly, just one car manufacturer informed its customers about this practice. The senators uncovered that BMW, Toyota, along with seven other prominent car companies, willingly share users' location data with law enforcement without the necessity of a judicial warrant.
Sharing Consumer Location Data Without Warrant: BMW, Toyota, 7 Others
This alarming revelation has raised significant privacy concerns among senators. As reported by CarScoops, there are concerns that car companies are falling short in safeguarding user privacy, occasionally disclosing sensitive information to authorities without the requisite warrant. A recent investigation highlighted that a mere five companies out of those scrutinized made it a policy to demand a warrant before releasing GPS data.
Additionally, CarScoops has provided insight into the initial correspondence directed to the FCC, where Congresswoman Debbie Dingell implored the committee to proactively address the misuse of connected vehicle technologies. Highlighting the urgency of the situation, Dingell emphasized the need to comprehensively comprehend and resolve issues arising from the inappropriate use of these technologies.
Noteworthy instances of domestic abusers leveraging vehicle connectivity features to monitor and manipulate their victims have underscored the critical importance of this call to action.
In her pursuit for enhanced consumer safety, Congresswoman Dingell aims for the outcomes of these advocacy efforts to empower survivors to promptly revoke or deactivate an abuser's access to vital vehicle data. Furthermore, she envisions a solution that not only bars abusers from exploiting service requests to regain access or data but also introduces safeguards to prevent such actions.
The findings reported by two other Senators concerning numerous automakers' stance on privacy align closely with Congresswoman Dingell's appeals, bolstering her calls for stronger protective measures in the automotive industry.
READ MORE: Polestar 5 Prototype Impresses with 10 Minute 10-80% Charge, Sets New Standards
PC Mag shares that two US senators have uncovered that eight automakers are willing to provide users' location data to law enforcement without the need for a court-issued warrant.
Senators Edward Markey and Ron Wyden wrote the Federal Trade Commission to state their concerns over specific automakers. The senators demand for an investigation into the activities of BMW, Kia, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Nissan, Subaru, Toyota, and Volkswagen.
Rumors have it that these large automakers may have misled consumers into believing they would require warrants or court orders before providing the agencies with customer location data. This latest news comes after the auto industry's commitment in 2014 to adhere to privacy guidelines, which included a promise to disclose sensitive location data only upon receipt of a valid warrant or court-sanctioned directive.
Only Six Companies Require Warrant
PC Mag also reports that an investigation conducted by Senators Wyden and Markey has revealed that out of the major car manufacturers, only six companies-Ford, GM, Honda, Stellantis, Tesla, and to a lesser extent Hyundai-mandate law enforcement to furnish a warrant when seeking access to users' location data.
Among these six, Tesla stands out as the sole entity with a practice of informing customers about legal requests, except in cases where a court-issued gag order is in effect. Conversely, the remaining eight automakers are willing to provide location data to government entities upon mere subpoena issuance.
This act bypasses the need for judicial scrutiny and approval. In their communication to the FTC, the senators express concern over these companies' practices, noting that such actions not only exhibit lax privacy safeguards but also contradict the public commitments these companies have made, potentially constituting deceptive conduct in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act.
RELATED ARTICLE: U.S. Regulations Mandate Automatic Emergency Braking in All New Vehicles Sold
Copyright @ MOTORTIMES, All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.